A European customer commissioned Xu Feng to produce two stainless steel cover designs, covering prototypes and a production batch of 1,000 sets. With part F741134_067 measuring just 0.8 mm thick, the project centered on thin-wall deformation, positioning and dimensional control. The reported outcome was flat parts with dimensions meeting the project requirements.
Project Background
The project involved two stainless steel cover designs, from prototype manufacturing to a batch of 1,000 sets. In addition to producing the specified profiles and machined features, the work required attention to the flat condition of the thin sections and dimensional consistency across production.
The 0.8 mm thickness of part F741134_067 was a key manufacturing consideration. Deflection under load and positioning between operations both presented challenges when working toward the final drawing requirements.
Figure 1. Recessed faces and edge profiles of the project cover parts.
Manufacturing Challenges
1. Deflection under cutting and clamping loads
At 0.8 mm thickness, a thin section can deflect under cutting forces. Elastic recovery after unclamping can then affect the final dimensions. Local clamping loads also need attention to avoid marking the surface or machining the part while it is distorted.
2. Vibration and residual stress
The relatively low stiffness of a thin section can make vibration a surface-quality concern. Redistribution of residual stress during material removal can also contribute to warping. These risks need to be considered together with the component geometry.
3. Drawing tolerances, datums and positioning
The project notes list H14, h14 and ±IT14/2 as the general dimensional tolerance requirements. The allowable deviations must be interpreted against the relevant dimensions and drawing requirements, rather than treated as a single numerical tolerance for the entire part.
The notes also identify unclear datum definitions, irregular-profile positioning and alignment across multiple setups as challenges. Differences in positioning between operations can accumulate into dimensional or fit deviations, making consistency important when moving from prototypes to batch production.
Figure 2. Machined faces with raised bosses and holes illustrate the parts’ multiple features.
Xu Feng’s Solutions
Address flatness and dimensional requirements together
For this project, thin-wall deformation control and drawing compliance were linked manufacturing priorities. Xu Feng addressed the challenges associated with cutting loads, clamping stability, stress-related distortion and positioning in completing the two cover designs.
A satisfactory cover requires both a flat form and dimensions that meet the project requirements. Completing an individual feature is only part of that task: the condition of the thin section and the relationships between features also matter.
Support the transition from prototypes to 1,000 sets
The scope covered prototypes and a production batch of 1,000 sets. Project feedback confirms that Xu Feng overcame the stated machining challenges, producing flat components with compliant dimensions. The case demonstrates Xu Feng’s capability to handle thin-wall stainless steel covers where deformation and dimensional control must be considered together.
Figure 3. Exterior surfaces and profiles of the stainless steel covers.
Developing thin-wall stainless steel covers or irregular metal components? Share your 2D drawings, 3D models, material grade and quantities with Xu Feng to discuss manufacturability, dimensional requirements and machining options. Discuss your custom machining project →










